Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy: Politics and Law in the Early American Republic (Paperback)

Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy: Politics and Law in the Early American Republic Cover Image
Email or call for price
Ships from Warehouse, Usually in 1-8 Days


The Bank of the United States sparked several rounds of intense debate over the meaning of the Constitution’s Necessary and Proper Clause, which authorizes the federal government to make laws that are “necessary” for exercising its other powers. Our standard account of the national bank controversy, however, is incomplete. The controversy was much more dynamic than a two-sided debate over a single constitutional provision and was shaped as much by politics as by law.

With Reconstructing the National Bank Controversy, Eric Lomazoff offers a far more robust account of the constitutional politics of national banking between 1791 and 1832. During that time, three forces—changes within the Bank itself, growing tension over federal power within the Republican coalition, and the endurance of monetary turmoil beyond the War of 1812 —drove the development of our first major debate over the scope of federal power at least as much as the formal dimensions of the Constitution or the absence of a shared legal definition for the word “necessary.” These three forces—sometimes alone, sometimes in combination—repeatedly reshaped the terms on which the Bank’s constitutionality was contested. Lomazoff documents how these three dimensions of the polity changed over time and traces the manner in which they periodically led federal officials to adjust their claims about the Bank’s constitutionality. This includes the emergence of the Coinage Clause—which gives Congress power to “coin money, regulate the value thereof”—as a novel justification for the institution. He concludes the book by explaining why a more robust account of the national bank controversy can help us understand the constitutional basis for modern American monetary politics.

About the Author

Eric Lomazoff is assistant professor of political science at Villanova University.

Praise For…

“Lomazoff presents a far more nuanced account of the constitutional politics of national banking. He convincingly demonstrates that the constitutional foundations of a national bank shifted over time and that this shift reflected in large part the changing functions of the Bank of the United States. The combination of economic, political, and constitutional development is first-rate, and the results shed new light on an important constitutional controversy.”

— Mark Graber, University of Maryland School of Law

“A complex and sparkling reinterpretation of the debates over the constitutionality of the chartering of a national bank by Congress from its proposal by Alexander Hamilton in 1791 until its eventual dissolution in the 1830s. Whereas previous studies have portrayed this forty-year constitutional drama as a straightforward debate over the Necessary and Proper or Sweeping Clause of the Constitution, Lomazoff busts this pervasive myth by also highlighting the importance of the Coinage Clause. This is an important book.”

— Alan Gibson, California State University, Chico

Product Details
ISBN: 9780226579450
ISBN-10: 022657945X
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Date: November 7th, 2018
Pages: 256
Language: English
Front facade of University Press Books

From 1974, University Press Books has stoked the blaze of well over ten thousand minds on fire, carrying new scholarship published by the great university presses in the English-speaking world.

Since our founding, we've added quality fiction and creative non-fiction to our selection, without drfiting from our mission to showcase top new texts introduced by university presses.

Order from us. Visit us. Let well-wrought words churn and burn within.